We will report on automatic alignment protocols that
have been in place for some years at three different beamlines at
the NSLS, two of them primarily for macromolecular crystallography.
Beam line alignment techniques fall generally into two categories:
those that address initial alignment for a particular kind of experiment,
and those that address maintenance or recovery of the initial alignment
after the experiment has begun. Although the automatic methods we
employ fall in the last category, they represent the final step in
an ab initio beamline alignment.
At beamline X25 we provide users with automatic optimization
methods to steer a monochromatized and focussed wiggler beam through
a pinhole. The algorithm makes use of theta tilt of a focussing mirror
for vertical motion and chi tilt of the second monochromator crystal
for horizontal motion. Fine theta tuning of the second monochromator
crystal is included in the scheme to maximize the flux throughput.
At beamline X12-B for some time we have employed a search
and lock-in algorithm for the tuning of the second monochromator crystal.
We have a reliable beam-dropout monitor that will pause and then resume
an experiment during filling of the ring. Recently we have devised
a non-intrusive video visualizer to fiduciate beam position relative
to the spindle, to allow first manual and eventually automatic steering
of the beam, permitting optimization of the beam and spindle alignment
with a specimen in place.
Beamline X12-C has employed automatic alignment of the
downstream portion of the beamline for 14 years, and we will describe
this experience. The same protocols devised for use at X12-C have
been transferred to X25 when it is being used for PX. These include
an algorithm to optimize the alignment of the optical table, on which
the diffractometer or other apparatus sits, and a curve-fitting algorithm
intended to set the monochromator to a wavelength that optimizes particular
features of a heavy atom's absorption spectrum. This feature provides
especially strong signals for MAD phasing. A principal feature of
the robustness of the system is reliance on a fixed-collimator diffractometer.
This allows one to decouple the difficulty of placing the beam at
the center of a three-axis diffractometer and perpendicular to its
major axis, from the problem of hanging the diffractometer on a focussed
beam from the synchrotron. We also will describe the use of GUIs to
provide user control of the process.
|